A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to make their loved ones house. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, in which growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining built by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their arranging authorization by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, that's partly constructed, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their view, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, an image which includes considering that come to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they ended up intended to Get visual proof from the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Periods described, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the drinking water through severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned Among the most placing descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these steps were cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was being encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected intimately from the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few merely seeking to create a relatives residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Particular Place of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out determined by professional tips and authorised ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean for the duration of a storm, do not change the underlying specifics.
The situation has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute about design of wall at coastal website is becoming a shorthand description for just a situation that many observers see as progressively widespread. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now additional contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental issues, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded by midsection-high drinking water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting each the Bodily reality of your coastline plus the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an extreme solution.
Because the High Court proceedings continue on, the result remains uncertain. The courtroom ought to determine if the wall as crafted complies with organizing authorization and no matter whether any encroachment into a Specific Space of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and arranging disorders. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who ought to Stay along with each other extended following the lawful expenditures are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over building operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong further than that handle. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. What's more, it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental defense and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of pure attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre with the dispute stands partially constructed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized queries. Irrespective of whether it'll ultimately be altered, eradicated, or concluded as planned will count on the court’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible go on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.