A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted countrywide consideration pursuing an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Times posting about René Collier plus the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has progressed right into a hugely publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, seek out to build their relatives residence. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being manufactured by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted under organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally inhabitants of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their preparing authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries of their web page, bringing about an encroachment over a Unique Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore regions are issue to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, specifically inside of a delicate coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their scheduling permission, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The pair accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their watch, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal planning disputes, where by views of the sea are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary initiatives through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In accordance with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waist-high water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods, a picture that has considering that develop into emblematic from the intensity with the dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they had been meant to Collect visual proof of the wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from your sea Irish Instances noted, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the h2o throughout significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the positioning turned Among the most striking descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that such actions had been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into a place impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been covered in detail via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as audience sought to be familiar with the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt construction pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital moment during the lawful timeline.
For the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as constructed, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has long been described as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling files, maps, and conditions attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal watch, insisting rather that it's about making sure that development at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their extended-standing link to the region and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple simply just wanting to establish a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Unique Area of Conservation and say that every one operates have already been performed dependant on Specialist assistance and accepted plans. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into The ocean all through a storm, never alter the underlying information.
The situation has also raised broader questions on how organizing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the condition that many observers see as progressively frequent. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming far more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier famous the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really diverse Expert backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, became synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning within the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods and René Collier waded by midsection-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting the two the Actual physical reality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature on the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive solution.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome stays unsure. The court docket ought to establish whether the wall as built complies with preparing authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Area of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and planning disorders. But the human element stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other extended after the authorized costs are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 the case increase further than that handle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. It also underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental challenges for instance environmental defense and residence rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a place of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre of your dispute stands partly designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful inquiries. No matter whether it will in the long run be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as prepared will depend upon the court docket’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely carry on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more closely watched arranging disputes in north Dublin recently.